TL;DR: Brahman outside the body == Atman inside the body.
Everything manifests from Brahman or Bhuma, and unmanifests, dissolves back into it.
Everything manifests from Brahman or Bhuma, and unmanifests, dissolves back into it.
Everything is real or existent.
But, the time duration of existence and non-existence of things varies.
Thus, a planet, say Earth, exists longer than a mosquito on Earth.
Non-existence precedes an individual existence and
non-existence again follows that existence. [0]
Space is an ill-defined and ill-definable substance or field.
Per science, space is unaffected [1] by matter - that which occupies space.
Unaffected by or unchanged by both the existence and non-existence of matter.
Matter is similarly unaffected by space.
Brahman is like space with respect to manifestation.
It is not affected by its own manifestations.
It stays the same every-where and every-when because
space and time themselves manifest from Brahman.
And since it is the ultimate cause by definition, it is itself uncaused. [2]
The space-matter relationship is bidirectional, i.e., space to matter and
matter to space relations.
But, neither is a cause-effect relation.
Matter does not do anything to or affect space in any way. [3]
Neither does space do anything to matter.
Consider:
1. Brahman or Bhuma is the subtlest or finest cause.
2. The gross or dense body (schoola shareera) is
a gross or dense effect.
3. Brahman that is encapsulated or infused into, or
Brahman that has manifested
grosser/denser bodies either
directly - causal body or kaaraNa shareera, or
indirectly - subtle body or sookSHma shareera,
is now termed aatma or jeeva-aatma.
Is the manifested or encapsulated (in-carne-ated, emln-fleshed) Brahman,
the jeeva, the effect, different from the cause?
Yes.
But is there any transfer in the opposite direction?
No.
NOTES
[0] Something unaffected by time, that exists independent of time, may be called eternal -
existing for every given value of time in the past, present, or future.
There may also be something existing from some particular time onwards, but
never becoming non-existent thereafter.
E.g., an extremely subtle idea or concept.
Its converse may also occur - something may have existed from the beginning of time,
but stops existing.
[1] At normal human-perceivable dimensions - neither cosmically huge nor
subatomically small, quantum.
[2] Or, trying to posit a cause leads logically to infinite regression:
Brahman manifests from Brahman Zero - B0.
B0 manifests from B-1.
B-1 manifests from B-2.
And so on.
What is the difference between Brahman and B0?
Or B0 and B-1?
Nothing intrinsic.
There is only a supposed or assumed cause-effect relation.
So this infinite regression is without any benefit by way of greater simplicity or abstraction.
[3] Again, in dimensions as in [1]. Gravitational waves and
the uncertainty principle work at exponentially different scales.
No comments:
Post a Comment