Tuesday, 6 January 2026

Brahman and Atman made simple

TL;DR: Brahman outside the body == Atman inside the body.

Everything manifests from Brahman or Bhuma, and unmanifests, dissolves back into it.

Everything is real or existent.
But, the time duration of existence and non-existence of things varies.
Thus, a planet, say Earth, exists longer than a mosquito on Earth.

Non-existence precedes an individual existence and
non-existence again follows that existence. [0]
 
Space is an ill-defined and ill-definable substance or field.
Per science, space is unaffected [1] by matter - that which occupies space.
Unaffected by or unchanged by both the existence and non-existence of matter.
Matter is similarly unaffected by space.

Brahman is like space with respect to manifestation.
It is not affected by  its own manifestations.
It stays the same every-where and every-when because
space and time themselves manifest from Brahman.
And since it is the ultimate cause by definition, it is itself uncaused. [2] 

The space-matter relationship is bidirectional, i.e., space to matter and
matter to space relations.
But, neither is a cause-effect relation.
Matter does not do anything to or affect space in any way. [3]
Neither does space do anything to matter.

Consider:
1. Brahman or Bhuma is the subtlest or finest cause.
2. The gross or dense body (schoola shareera) is 
a gross or dense effect.
3. Brahman that is encapsulated or infused into, or 
Brahman that has manifested
grosser/denser bodies either 
directly - causal body or kaaraNa shareera, or 
indirectly - subtle body or sookSHma shareera,
is now termed aatma or jeeva-aatma.

Is the manifested or encapsulated (in-carne-ated, emln-fleshed) Brahman,
the jeeva, the effect, different from the cause?

Yes.

But is there any transfer in the opposite direction?

No.

NOTES

[0] Something unaffected by time, that exists independent of time, may be called eternal -
existing for every given value of time in the past, present, or future.
There may also be something existing from some particular time onwards, but
never becoming non-existent thereafter.
E.g., an extremely subtle idea or concept.
Its converse may also occur - something may have existed from the beginning of time,
but stops existing.

[1] At normal human-perceivable dimensions - neither cosmically huge nor
subatomically small, quantum.

[2] Or, trying to posit a cause leads logically to infinite regression:
Brahman manifests from Brahman Zero - B0.
B0 manifests from B-1.
B-1 manifests from B-2.
And so on.

What is the difference between Brahman and B0? 
Or B0 and B-1?
Nothing intrinsic. 
There is only a supposed or assumed cause-effect relation. 
So this infinite regression is without any benefit by way of greater simplicity or abstraction.

[3] Again, in dimensions as in [1]. Gravitational waves and
the uncertainty principle work at exponentially different scales.

No comments:

Post a Comment